Complaints & Recalls
Official Safety Recalls - Important!
3 RecallsThese are official manufacturer recalls ordered by NHTSA for safety defects. If you own this vehicle, contact your dealer immediately for free repairs.
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing
Safety Issue:
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain 2016-2018 Toyota Prius vehicles. A portion of the engine wire harness connected to the hybrid Power Control Unit (PCU), could contact the cover at this connection and wear, causing an electrical short circuit.
Potential Risk:
FREE Recall Solution:
Additional Details:
Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.safercar.gov.
Mfg Campaign: J0T
Recall Date: Sep 5, 2018
Gulf States Toyota, Inc.
Safety Issue:
Gulf States Toyota, Inc. (Gulf States) is recalling certain 2017 4Runner , 86, Avalon, Camry, Camry Hybrid, Corolla, Corolla iM, Highlander, Highlander Hybrid, Prius, Prius C, RAV4, RAV4 Hybrid, Sienna and Yaris vehicles. The spare tire air pressure was not adjusted to the proper pressure as stated on the Tire Pressure Label.
Potential Risk:
FREE Recall Solution:
Additional Details:
Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.safercar.gov.
Mfg Campaign: 17R2
Recall Date: May 2, 2017
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing
Safety Issue:
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing (Toyota) is recalling certain model year 2016-2017 Prius vehicles manufactured August 6, 2015, to October 3, 2016. The affected vehicles are equipped with a foot-operated parking brake system that has a parking brake cable that may disengage.
Potential Risk:
FREE Recall Solution:
Additional Details:
Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.safercar.gov.
Mfg Campaign: G01
Recall Date: Oct 14, 2016
Consumer Complaints
124 ComplaintsToyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
SERVICE BRAKES
Potential Consequences:
WHEN DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY DURING RAIN THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL SPONTANEOUSLY STOPS AND LASHES ON THE DASH DISPLAY THAT IT IS NO LONGER SET, THE CAR DECELERATES RAPIDLY, LEAVING THE DRIVER SCRAMBLING TO DETERMINE WHAT HAS HAPPENED. THE SYSTEMS INVOLVED ARE THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL AND "TOYOTA SAFETY SENSE."
Corrective Action:
WHEN DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY DURING RAIN THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL SPONTANEOUSLY STOPS AND LASHES ON THE DASH DISPLAY THAT IT IS NO LONGER SET, THE CAR DECELERATES RAPIDLY, LEAVING THE DRIVER SCRAMBLING TO DETERMINE WHAT HAS HAPPENED. THE SYSTEMS INVOLVED ARE THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL AND "TOYOTA SAFETY SENSE."
Additional Notes:
WHEN DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY DURING RAIN THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL SPONTANEOUSLY STOPS AND LASHES ON THE DASH DISPLAY THAT IT IS NO LONGER SET, THE CAR DECELERATES RAPIDLY, LEAVING THE DRIVER SCRAMBLING TO DETERMINE WHAT HAS HAPPENED. THE SYSTEMS INVOLVED ARE THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL AND "TOYOTA SAFETY SENSE."
Mfg Campaign: 11170968
Recall Date: Jan 19, 2019
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC)
Potential Consequences:
WHEN DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY DURING RAIN THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL SPONTANEOUSLY STOPS AND LASHES ON THE DASH DISPLAY THAT IT IS NO LONGER SET, THE CAR DECELERATES RAPIDLY, LEAVING THE DRIVER SCRAMBLING TO DETERMINE WHAT HAS HAPPENED. THE SYSTEMS INVOLVED ARE THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL AND "TOYOTA SAFETY SENSE."
Corrective Action:
WHEN DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY DURING RAIN THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL SPONTANEOUSLY STOPS AND LASHES ON THE DASH DISPLAY THAT IT IS NO LONGER SET, THE CAR DECELERATES RAPIDLY, LEAVING THE DRIVER SCRAMBLING TO DETERMINE WHAT HAS HAPPENED. THE SYSTEMS INVOLVED ARE THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL AND "TOYOTA SAFETY SENSE."
Additional Notes:
WHEN DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY DURING RAIN THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL SPONTANEOUSLY STOPS AND LASHES ON THE DASH DISPLAY THAT IT IS NO LONGER SET, THE CAR DECELERATES RAPIDLY, LEAVING THE DRIVER SCRAMBLING TO DETERMINE WHAT HAS HAPPENED. THE SYSTEMS INVOLVED ARE THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL AND "TOYOTA SAFETY SENSE."
Mfg Campaign: 11170968
Recall Date: Jan 19, 2019
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Potential Consequences:
WHEN DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY DURING RAIN THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL SPONTANEOUSLY STOPS AND LASHES ON THE DASH DISPLAY THAT IT IS NO LONGER SET, THE CAR DECELERATES RAPIDLY, LEAVING THE DRIVER SCRAMBLING TO DETERMINE WHAT HAS HAPPENED. THE SYSTEMS INVOLVED ARE THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL AND "TOYOTA SAFETY SENSE."
Corrective Action:
WHEN DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY DURING RAIN THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL SPONTANEOUSLY STOPS AND LASHES ON THE DASH DISPLAY THAT IT IS NO LONGER SET, THE CAR DECELERATES RAPIDLY, LEAVING THE DRIVER SCRAMBLING TO DETERMINE WHAT HAS HAPPENED. THE SYSTEMS INVOLVED ARE THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL AND "TOYOTA SAFETY SENSE."
Additional Notes:
WHEN DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY DURING RAIN THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL SPONTANEOUSLY STOPS AND LASHES ON THE DASH DISPLAY THAT IT IS NO LONGER SET, THE CAR DECELERATES RAPIDLY, LEAVING THE DRIVER SCRAMBLING TO DETERMINE WHAT HAS HAPPENED. THE SYSTEMS INVOLVED ARE THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL AND "TOYOTA SAFETY SENSE."
Mfg Campaign: 11170968
Recall Date: Jan 19, 2019
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
Potential Consequences:
UNABLE TO FILL GAS TANK. VAPOR-CONTAINMENT VALVE ENGAGES DURING REFUELLING, CAUSING FUEL TO SPILL TO GROUND AND UNABLE TO FILL MORE THAT ONE-HALF GALLON OF FUEL. SEE ALSO: HTTPS://PRIUSCHAT.COM/THREADS/INTERESTING-FUEL-ISSUE-2016-THREE-TOURING-OVERFLOWING.173660/ (SEARCH FOR "OVERFLOW" - YOU WILL SEE THAT THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM)
Corrective Action:
UNABLE TO FILL GAS TANK. VAPOR-CONTAINMENT VALVE ENGAGES DURING REFUELLING, CAUSING FUEL TO SPILL TO GROUND AND UNABLE TO FILL MORE THAT ONE-HALF GALLON OF FUEL. SEE ALSO: HTTPS://PRIUSCHAT.COM/THREADS/INTERESTING-FUEL-ISSUE-2016-THREE-TOURING-OVERFLOWING.173660/ (SEARCH FOR "OVERFLOW" - YOU WILL SEE THAT THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM)
Additional Notes:
UNABLE TO FILL GAS TANK. VAPOR-CONTAINMENT VALVE ENGAGES DURING REFUELLING, CAUSING FUEL TO SPILL TO GROUND AND UNABLE TO FILL MORE THAT ONE-HALF GALLON OF FUEL. SEE ALSO: HTTPS://PRIUSCHAT.COM/THREADS/INTERESTING-FUEL-ISSUE-2016-THREE-TOURING-OVERFLOWING.173660/ (SEARCH FOR "OVERFLOW" - YOU WILL SEE THAT THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM)
Mfg Campaign: 11156794
Recall Date: Dec 7, 2018
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
Potential Consequences:
CAR WAS ON 2 LANE BLACKTOP IN 40 MPH ZONE DRIVING APX 35 MPH, A FEMALE, RESPONSIBLE OWNER/DRIVER AGE 79 WAS DRIVING WHEN SUDDENLY,WITHOUT ANY WARNING,COMES TO NEAR HALT IN ROAD AND PULLS/HARD TO RIGHT HAND SIDE OF SHOULDER OFF THE ROAD. DRIVER HAD NO CONTROL OVER DIRECTION OR SPEED BEFORE FINALLY ABLE TO STOP CAR ON TOP OF DITCH. DRIVER WAS ABLE TO GET CAR TO STALL/STOP ENGINE BEFORE REACHING DITCH AND POSSIBLY A TURNOVER. DRIVER HAD NEVER BEEN SO FEARFUL IN HER LIFE,HAD SHE BEEN UNABLE TO STOP CAR IT WOULD HAVE DRIVEN HER OVER.REPORTED SITUATION TO LOCAL TOYOTA DEALERSHIP AND THEY STATED THEY COULD NOT;T FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH CAR SENDING DRIVER BACK OUT ON ROAD WITH CAR, THIS IS VERY SERIOUS SITUATION. THANKFUL SHE WAS ON SMALL COUNTRY IOAD AND NOT ON BUSY HWY OR THIS CAR WOULD HAVE "PULLED/LEAD" HER INTO OTHER TRAFFIC, OR WORSE, A SIDEWALK FULL OF PEOPLE AND OR CHILDREN. SHE HAD NO CONTROL OF CAR FOR WHAT SEEMED LIKE A FULL MINUTE OR MORE
Corrective Action:
CAR WAS ON 2 LANE BLACKTOP IN 40 MPH ZONE DRIVING APX 35 MPH, A FEMALE, RESPONSIBLE OWNER/DRIVER AGE 79 WAS DRIVING WHEN SUDDENLY,WITHOUT ANY WARNING,COMES TO NEAR HALT IN ROAD AND PULLS/HARD TO RIGHT HAND SIDE OF SHOULDER OFF THE ROAD. DRIVER HAD NO CONTROL OVER DIRECTION OR SPEED BEFORE FINALLY ABLE TO STOP CAR ON TOP OF DITCH. DRIVER WAS ABLE TO GET CAR TO STALL/STOP ENGINE BEFORE REACHING DITCH AND POSSIBLY A TURNOVER. DRIVER HAD NEVER BEEN SO FEARFUL IN HER LIFE,HAD SHE BEEN UNABLE TO STOP CAR IT WOULD HAVE DRIVEN HER OVER.REPORTED SITUATION TO LOCAL TOYOTA DEALERSHIP AND THEY STATED THEY COULD NOT;T FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH CAR SENDING DRIVER BACK OUT ON ROAD WITH CAR, THIS IS VERY SERIOUS SITUATION. THANKFUL SHE WAS ON SMALL COUNTRY IOAD AND NOT ON BUSY HWY OR THIS CAR WOULD HAVE "PULLED/LEAD" HER INTO OTHER TRAFFIC, OR WORSE, A SIDEWALK FULL OF PEOPLE AND OR CHILDREN. SHE HAD NO CONTROL OF CAR FOR WHAT SEEMED LIKE A FULL MINUTE OR MORE
Additional Notes:
CAR WAS ON 2 LANE BLACKTOP IN 40 MPH ZONE DRIVING APX 35 MPH, A FEMALE, RESPONSIBLE OWNER/DRIVER AGE 79 WAS DRIVING WHEN SUDDENLY,WITHOUT ANY WARNING,COMES TO NEAR HALT IN ROAD AND PULLS/HARD TO RIGHT HAND SIDE OF SHOULDER OFF THE ROAD. DRIVER HAD NO CONTROL OVER DIRECTION OR SPEED BEFORE FINALLY ABLE TO STOP CAR ON TOP OF DITCH. DRIVER WAS ABLE TO GET CAR TO STALL/STOP ENGINE BEFORE REACHING DITCH AND POSSIBLY A TURNOVER. DRIVER HAD NEVER BEEN SO FEARFUL IN HER LIFE,HAD SHE BEEN UNABLE TO STOP CAR IT WOULD HAVE DRIVEN HER OVER.REPORTED SITUATION TO LOCAL TOYOTA DEALERSHIP AND THEY STATED THEY COULD NOT;T FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH CAR SENDING DRIVER BACK OUT ON ROAD WITH CAR, THIS IS VERY SERIOUS SITUATION. THANKFUL SHE WAS ON SMALL COUNTRY IOAD AND NOT ON BUSY HWY OR THIS CAR WOULD HAVE "PULLED/LEAD" HER INTO OTHER TRAFFIC, OR WORSE, A SIDEWALK FULL OF PEOPLE AND OR CHILDREN. SHE HAD NO CONTROL OF CAR FOR WHAT SEEMED LIKE A FULL MINUTE OR MORE
Mfg Campaign: 11155825
Recall Date: Dec 4, 2018
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
STEERING
Potential Consequences:
CAR WAS ON 2 LANE BLACKTOP IN 40 MPH ZONE DRIVING APX 35 MPH, A FEMALE, RESPONSIBLE OWNER/DRIVER AGE 79 WAS DRIVING WHEN SUDDENLY,WITHOUT ANY WARNING,COMES TO NEAR HALT IN ROAD AND PULLS/HARD TO RIGHT HAND SIDE OF SHOULDER OFF THE ROAD. DRIVER HAD NO CONTROL OVER DIRECTION OR SPEED BEFORE FINALLY ABLE TO STOP CAR ON TOP OF DITCH. DRIVER WAS ABLE TO GET CAR TO STALL/STOP ENGINE BEFORE REACHING DITCH AND POSSIBLY A TURNOVER. DRIVER HAD NEVER BEEN SO FEARFUL IN HER LIFE,HAD SHE BEEN UNABLE TO STOP CAR IT WOULD HAVE DRIVEN HER OVER.REPORTED SITUATION TO LOCAL TOYOTA DEALERSHIP AND THEY STATED THEY COULD NOT;T FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH CAR SENDING DRIVER BACK OUT ON ROAD WITH CAR, THIS IS VERY SERIOUS SITUATION. THANKFUL SHE WAS ON SMALL COUNTRY IOAD AND NOT ON BUSY HWY OR THIS CAR WOULD HAVE "PULLED/LEAD" HER INTO OTHER TRAFFIC, OR WORSE, A SIDEWALK FULL OF PEOPLE AND OR CHILDREN. SHE HAD NO CONTROL OF CAR FOR WHAT SEEMED LIKE A FULL MINUTE OR MORE
Corrective Action:
CAR WAS ON 2 LANE BLACKTOP IN 40 MPH ZONE DRIVING APX 35 MPH, A FEMALE, RESPONSIBLE OWNER/DRIVER AGE 79 WAS DRIVING WHEN SUDDENLY,WITHOUT ANY WARNING,COMES TO NEAR HALT IN ROAD AND PULLS/HARD TO RIGHT HAND SIDE OF SHOULDER OFF THE ROAD. DRIVER HAD NO CONTROL OVER DIRECTION OR SPEED BEFORE FINALLY ABLE TO STOP CAR ON TOP OF DITCH. DRIVER WAS ABLE TO GET CAR TO STALL/STOP ENGINE BEFORE REACHING DITCH AND POSSIBLY A TURNOVER. DRIVER HAD NEVER BEEN SO FEARFUL IN HER LIFE,HAD SHE BEEN UNABLE TO STOP CAR IT WOULD HAVE DRIVEN HER OVER.REPORTED SITUATION TO LOCAL TOYOTA DEALERSHIP AND THEY STATED THEY COULD NOT;T FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH CAR SENDING DRIVER BACK OUT ON ROAD WITH CAR, THIS IS VERY SERIOUS SITUATION. THANKFUL SHE WAS ON SMALL COUNTRY IOAD AND NOT ON BUSY HWY OR THIS CAR WOULD HAVE "PULLED/LEAD" HER INTO OTHER TRAFFIC, OR WORSE, A SIDEWALK FULL OF PEOPLE AND OR CHILDREN. SHE HAD NO CONTROL OF CAR FOR WHAT SEEMED LIKE A FULL MINUTE OR MORE
Additional Notes:
CAR WAS ON 2 LANE BLACKTOP IN 40 MPH ZONE DRIVING APX 35 MPH, A FEMALE, RESPONSIBLE OWNER/DRIVER AGE 79 WAS DRIVING WHEN SUDDENLY,WITHOUT ANY WARNING,COMES TO NEAR HALT IN ROAD AND PULLS/HARD TO RIGHT HAND SIDE OF SHOULDER OFF THE ROAD. DRIVER HAD NO CONTROL OVER DIRECTION OR SPEED BEFORE FINALLY ABLE TO STOP CAR ON TOP OF DITCH. DRIVER WAS ABLE TO GET CAR TO STALL/STOP ENGINE BEFORE REACHING DITCH AND POSSIBLY A TURNOVER. DRIVER HAD NEVER BEEN SO FEARFUL IN HER LIFE,HAD SHE BEEN UNABLE TO STOP CAR IT WOULD HAVE DRIVEN HER OVER.REPORTED SITUATION TO LOCAL TOYOTA DEALERSHIP AND THEY STATED THEY COULD NOT;T FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH CAR SENDING DRIVER BACK OUT ON ROAD WITH CAR, THIS IS VERY SERIOUS SITUATION. THANKFUL SHE WAS ON SMALL COUNTRY IOAD AND NOT ON BUSY HWY OR THIS CAR WOULD HAVE "PULLED/LEAD" HER INTO OTHER TRAFFIC, OR WORSE, A SIDEWALK FULL OF PEOPLE AND OR CHILDREN. SHE HAD NO CONTROL OF CAR FOR WHAT SEEMED LIKE A FULL MINUTE OR MORE
Mfg Campaign: 11155825
Recall Date: Dec 4, 2018
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
STEERING
Potential Consequences:
VEHICLE'S STEERING WHEEL BEGAN PEELING AT (12 O' CLOCK LOCATION). THE CAR HAS BEEN PARKED ON THE STREET AND GARAGED (NORMAL EXPOSURE TO SUN). FIRST, IT BEGAN TO BUBBLE AND THEN IT PEELED UNTIL NOW REACHING A3 INCHES WIDE.
Corrective Action:
VEHICLE'S STEERING WHEEL BEGAN PEELING AT (12 O' CLOCK LOCATION). THE CAR HAS BEEN PARKED ON THE STREET AND GARAGED (NORMAL EXPOSURE TO SUN). FIRST, IT BEGAN TO BUBBLE AND THEN IT PEELED UNTIL NOW REACHING A3 INCHES WIDE.
Additional Notes:
VEHICLE'S STEERING WHEEL BEGAN PEELING AT (12 O' CLOCK LOCATION). THE CAR HAS BEEN PARKED ON THE STREET AND GARAGED (NORMAL EXPOSURE TO SUN). FIRST, IT BEGAN TO BUBBLE AND THEN IT PEELED UNTIL NOW REACHING A3 INCHES WIDE.
Mfg Campaign: 11144823
Recall Date: Nov 2, 2018
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL
Potential Consequences:
THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL IN THIS VEHICLE HAS SEVERAL OPERATIONAL ISSUES (PROGRAMMING BUGS OR DEFECTS) WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS. PERHAPS THE MOST POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS BEHAVIOR OF THE SYSTEM IS AS FOLLOWS: - WHEN USING ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL, THE SYSTEM AUTOMATICALLY ACCELERATES AND APPLIES BRAKING FORCE TO STAY A SET DISTANCE (ONE OF THREE DISTANCES) FROM THE NEAREST PRECEDING VEHICLE. - WHEN THE NEAREST PRECEDING VEHICLE CHANGES LANES, THE SYSTEM CAN BECOME CONFUSED, DISPLAY "NO PRECEDING VEHICLE" AND DISENGAGE. - THIS BEHAVIOR CAN BE DANGEROUS OR LIFE-THREATENING IN SOME CASES, WHICH I'VE EXPERIENCED SEVERAL TIMES: WHAT HAPPENED: - HIGHWAY DRIVING AT 65MPH, USING ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL AND FOLLOWING ANOTHER VEHICLE. - WE APPROACH AN AREA OF CONGESTION OR STOPPED VEHICLES (A TRAFFIC JAM). - THE PRECEDING VEHICLE BEGINS QUICK DECELERATION IN ORDER TO AVOID REAR-ENDING THE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF IT. - MY ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL ALSO APPLIES STRONG BRAKING TO MAINTAIN ITS PROGRAMMED DISTANCE - THE PRECEDING VEHICLE CHANGES LANES OUT OF MY LANE - MY ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL DISPLAYS "NO PRECEDING VEHICLE" AND DISENGAGES, WHICH MEANS THAT IT STOPS BRAKING - MY CAR IS NOW FLYING INTO THE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF ME, GIVING ME ONLY A MOMENT TO REACT AND APPLY BRAKING. INSTEAD OF DISENGAGING DURING BRAKING, THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL SHOULD CONTINUE BRAKING DOWN TO A SPEED OF 25MPH, WHICH IS THE MAXIMUM SPEED THAT TOYOTA'S SAFETY STOP OPERATES AT TO BRING A CAR TO A COMPLETE STOP. THE CURRENT BEHAVIOR OF THE SYSTEM HAS LED TO SEVERAL NEAR ACCIDENTS IN MY HIGHWAY DRIVING, AND IS UNDOUBTEDLY A DANGER TO ANYONE ELSE WHO USES A TOYOTA ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL OF THIS MODEL ON THE HIGHWAY. I REPORTED THIS ISSUE TO TOYOTA LAST YEAR AND THEY SEEM UNINTERESTED IN FIXING IT, REFUSING EVEN TO CONVEY MY REPORT TO THEIR DEVELOPERS IN JAPAN.
Corrective Action:
THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL IN THIS VEHICLE HAS SEVERAL OPERATIONAL ISSUES (PROGRAMMING BUGS OR DEFECTS) WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS. PERHAPS THE MOST POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS BEHAVIOR OF THE SYSTEM IS AS FOLLOWS: - WHEN USING ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL, THE SYSTEM AUTOMATICALLY ACCELERATES AND APPLIES BRAKING FORCE TO STAY A SET DISTANCE (ONE OF THREE DISTANCES) FROM THE NEAREST PRECEDING VEHICLE. - WHEN THE NEAREST PRECEDING VEHICLE CHANGES LANES, THE SYSTEM CAN BECOME CONFUSED, DISPLAY "NO PRECEDING VEHICLE" AND DISENGAGE. - THIS BEHAVIOR CAN BE DANGEROUS OR LIFE-THREATENING IN SOME CASES, WHICH I'VE EXPERIENCED SEVERAL TIMES: WHAT HAPPENED: - HIGHWAY DRIVING AT 65MPH, USING ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL AND FOLLOWING ANOTHER VEHICLE. - WE APPROACH AN AREA OF CONGESTION OR STOPPED VEHICLES (A TRAFFIC JAM). - THE PRECEDING VEHICLE BEGINS QUICK DECELERATION IN ORDER TO AVOID REAR-ENDING THE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF IT. - MY ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL ALSO APPLIES STRONG BRAKING TO MAINTAIN ITS PROGRAMMED DISTANCE - THE PRECEDING VEHICLE CHANGES LANES OUT OF MY LANE - MY ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL DISPLAYS "NO PRECEDING VEHICLE" AND DISENGAGES, WHICH MEANS THAT IT STOPS BRAKING - MY CAR IS NOW FLYING INTO THE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF ME, GIVING ME ONLY A MOMENT TO REACT AND APPLY BRAKING. INSTEAD OF DISENGAGING DURING BRAKING, THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL SHOULD CONTINUE BRAKING DOWN TO A SPEED OF 25MPH, WHICH IS THE MAXIMUM SPEED THAT TOYOTA'S SAFETY STOP OPERATES AT TO BRING A CAR TO A COMPLETE STOP. THE CURRENT BEHAVIOR OF THE SYSTEM HAS LED TO SEVERAL NEAR ACCIDENTS IN MY HIGHWAY DRIVING, AND IS UNDOUBTEDLY A DANGER TO ANYONE ELSE WHO USES A TOYOTA ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL OF THIS MODEL ON THE HIGHWAY. I REPORTED THIS ISSUE TO TOYOTA LAST YEAR AND THEY SEEM UNINTERESTED IN FIXING IT, REFUSING EVEN TO CONVEY MY REPORT TO THEIR DEVELOPERS IN JAPAN.
Additional Notes:
THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL IN THIS VEHICLE HAS SEVERAL OPERATIONAL ISSUES (PROGRAMMING BUGS OR DEFECTS) WHICH ARE POTENTIALLY EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS. PERHAPS THE MOST POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS BEHAVIOR OF THE SYSTEM IS AS FOLLOWS: - WHEN USING ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL, THE SYSTEM AUTOMATICALLY ACCELERATES AND APPLIES BRAKING FORCE TO STAY A SET DISTANCE (ONE OF THREE DISTANCES) FROM THE NEAREST PRECEDING VEHICLE. - WHEN THE NEAREST PRECEDING VEHICLE CHANGES LANES, THE SYSTEM CAN BECOME CONFUSED, DISPLAY "NO PRECEDING VEHICLE" AND DISENGAGE. - THIS BEHAVIOR CAN BE DANGEROUS OR LIFE-THREATENING IN SOME CASES, WHICH I'VE EXPERIENCED SEVERAL TIMES: WHAT HAPPENED: - HIGHWAY DRIVING AT 65MPH, USING ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL AND FOLLOWING ANOTHER VEHICLE. - WE APPROACH AN AREA OF CONGESTION OR STOPPED VEHICLES (A TRAFFIC JAM). - THE PRECEDING VEHICLE BEGINS QUICK DECELERATION IN ORDER TO AVOID REAR-ENDING THE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF IT. - MY ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL ALSO APPLIES STRONG BRAKING TO MAINTAIN ITS PROGRAMMED DISTANCE - THE PRECEDING VEHICLE CHANGES LANES OUT OF MY LANE - MY ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL DISPLAYS "NO PRECEDING VEHICLE" AND DISENGAGES, WHICH MEANS THAT IT STOPS BRAKING - MY CAR IS NOW FLYING INTO THE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF ME, GIVING ME ONLY A MOMENT TO REACT AND APPLY BRAKING. INSTEAD OF DISENGAGING DURING BRAKING, THE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL SHOULD CONTINUE BRAKING DOWN TO A SPEED OF 25MPH, WHICH IS THE MAXIMUM SPEED THAT TOYOTA'S SAFETY STOP OPERATES AT TO BRING A CAR TO A COMPLETE STOP. THE CURRENT BEHAVIOR OF THE SYSTEM HAS LED TO SEVERAL NEAR ACCIDENTS IN MY HIGHWAY DRIVING, AND IS UNDOUBTEDLY A DANGER TO ANYONE ELSE WHO USES A TOYOTA ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL OF THIS MODEL ON THE HIGHWAY. I REPORTED THIS ISSUE TO TOYOTA LAST YEAR AND THEY SEEM UNINTERESTED IN FIXING IT, REFUSING EVEN TO CONVEY MY REPORT TO THEIR DEVELOPERS IN JAPAN.
Mfg Campaign: 11141907
Recall Date: Oct 22, 2018
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
POWER TRAIN
Potential Consequences:
I WAS GOING TO MAKE A RIGHT TURN AND THE CAR WOULD NOT ACCELERATE RIGHT AWAY EVEN THOUGH IT WAS IN "D" MY HUSBAND SAID HE EXPERIENCED THE SAME THING TWICE WHILE DRIVING THIS CAR.
Corrective Action:
I WAS GOING TO MAKE A RIGHT TURN AND THE CAR WOULD NOT ACCELERATE RIGHT AWAY EVEN THOUGH IT WAS IN "D" MY HUSBAND SAID HE EXPERIENCED THE SAME THING TWICE WHILE DRIVING THIS CAR.
Additional Notes:
I WAS GOING TO MAKE A RIGHT TURN AND THE CAR WOULD NOT ACCELERATE RIGHT AWAY EVEN THOUGH IT WAS IN "D" MY HUSBAND SAID HE EXPERIENCED THE SAME THING TWICE WHILE DRIVING THIS CAR.
Mfg Campaign: 11138823
Recall Date: Oct 6, 2018
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Potential Consequences:
WHILE DRIVING ON I-75 THERE SEEMS TO BE A SPARK CAUSED FUEL TO LEAK AND BURN BACK TIRE AND THE TIRE ROLLED OFF THE FREEWAY PUTTING ALL THE FIVE PASSENGERS INTO A HAZARDOUS SITUATION ON THE I-75 FREEWAY. WE SMELLED SMELL OF TIRE AND GAS LEAK. FORTUNATELY, WE WERE ABLE TO PULL OFF THE FREEWAY. IT WAS REPORTED TO TOYOTA AND THEIR DEALERS MULTIPLE TIMES. NO ONE EVEN BOTHERED OR CONCERNED ABOUT THE ISSUE OR SAFETY OF PASSENGERS.
Corrective Action:
WHILE DRIVING ON I-75 THERE SEEMS TO BE A SPARK CAUSED FUEL TO LEAK AND BURN BACK TIRE AND THE TIRE ROLLED OFF THE FREEWAY PUTTING ALL THE FIVE PASSENGERS INTO A HAZARDOUS SITUATION ON THE I-75 FREEWAY. WE SMELLED SMELL OF TIRE AND GAS LEAK. FORTUNATELY, WE WERE ABLE TO PULL OFF THE FREEWAY. IT WAS REPORTED TO TOYOTA AND THEIR DEALERS MULTIPLE TIMES. NO ONE EVEN BOTHERED OR CONCERNED ABOUT THE ISSUE OR SAFETY OF PASSENGERS.
Additional Notes:
WHILE DRIVING ON I-75 THERE SEEMS TO BE A SPARK CAUSED FUEL TO LEAK AND BURN BACK TIRE AND THE TIRE ROLLED OFF THE FREEWAY PUTTING ALL THE FIVE PASSENGERS INTO A HAZARDOUS SITUATION ON THE I-75 FREEWAY. WE SMELLED SMELL OF TIRE AND GAS LEAK. FORTUNATELY, WE WERE ABLE TO PULL OFF THE FREEWAY. IT WAS REPORTED TO TOYOTA AND THEIR DEALERS MULTIPLE TIMES. NO ONE EVEN BOTHERED OR CONCERNED ABOUT THE ISSUE OR SAFETY OF PASSENGERS.
Mfg Campaign: 11133438
Recall Date: Oct 5, 2018
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
Potential Consequences:
WHILE DRIVING ON I-75 THERE SEEMS TO BE A SPARK CAUSED FUEL TO LEAK AND BURN BACK TIRE AND THE TIRE ROLLED OFF THE FREEWAY PUTTING ALL THE FIVE PASSENGERS INTO A HAZARDOUS SITUATION ON THE I-75 FREEWAY. WE SMELLED SMELL OF TIRE AND GAS LEAK. FORTUNATELY, WE WERE ABLE TO PULL OFF THE FREEWAY. IT WAS REPORTED TO TOYOTA AND THEIR DEALERS MULTIPLE TIMES. NO ONE EVEN BOTHERED OR CONCERNED ABOUT THE ISSUE OR SAFETY OF PASSENGERS.
Corrective Action:
WHILE DRIVING ON I-75 THERE SEEMS TO BE A SPARK CAUSED FUEL TO LEAK AND BURN BACK TIRE AND THE TIRE ROLLED OFF THE FREEWAY PUTTING ALL THE FIVE PASSENGERS INTO A HAZARDOUS SITUATION ON THE I-75 FREEWAY. WE SMELLED SMELL OF TIRE AND GAS LEAK. FORTUNATELY, WE WERE ABLE TO PULL OFF THE FREEWAY. IT WAS REPORTED TO TOYOTA AND THEIR DEALERS MULTIPLE TIMES. NO ONE EVEN BOTHERED OR CONCERNED ABOUT THE ISSUE OR SAFETY OF PASSENGERS.
Additional Notes:
WHILE DRIVING ON I-75 THERE SEEMS TO BE A SPARK CAUSED FUEL TO LEAK AND BURN BACK TIRE AND THE TIRE ROLLED OFF THE FREEWAY PUTTING ALL THE FIVE PASSENGERS INTO A HAZARDOUS SITUATION ON THE I-75 FREEWAY. WE SMELLED SMELL OF TIRE AND GAS LEAK. FORTUNATELY, WE WERE ABLE TO PULL OFF THE FREEWAY. IT WAS REPORTED TO TOYOTA AND THEIR DEALERS MULTIPLE TIMES. NO ONE EVEN BOTHERED OR CONCERNED ABOUT THE ISSUE OR SAFETY OF PASSENGERS.
Mfg Campaign: 11133438
Recall Date: Oct 5, 2018
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
WHEELS
Potential Consequences:
WHILE DRIVING ON I-75 THERE SEEMS TO BE A SPARK CAUSED FUEL TO LEAK AND BURN BACK TIRE AND THE TIRE ROLLED OFF THE FREEWAY PUTTING ALL THE FIVE PASSENGERS INTO A HAZARDOUS SITUATION ON THE I-75 FREEWAY. WE SMELLED SMELL OF TIRE AND GAS LEAK. FORTUNATELY, WE WERE ABLE TO PULL OFF THE FREEWAY. IT WAS REPORTED TO TOYOTA AND THEIR DEALERS MULTIPLE TIMES. NO ONE EVEN BOTHERED OR CONCERNED ABOUT THE ISSUE OR SAFETY OF PASSENGERS.
Corrective Action:
WHILE DRIVING ON I-75 THERE SEEMS TO BE A SPARK CAUSED FUEL TO LEAK AND BURN BACK TIRE AND THE TIRE ROLLED OFF THE FREEWAY PUTTING ALL THE FIVE PASSENGERS INTO A HAZARDOUS SITUATION ON THE I-75 FREEWAY. WE SMELLED SMELL OF TIRE AND GAS LEAK. FORTUNATELY, WE WERE ABLE TO PULL OFF THE FREEWAY. IT WAS REPORTED TO TOYOTA AND THEIR DEALERS MULTIPLE TIMES. NO ONE EVEN BOTHERED OR CONCERNED ABOUT THE ISSUE OR SAFETY OF PASSENGERS.
Additional Notes:
WHILE DRIVING ON I-75 THERE SEEMS TO BE A SPARK CAUSED FUEL TO LEAK AND BURN BACK TIRE AND THE TIRE ROLLED OFF THE FREEWAY PUTTING ALL THE FIVE PASSENGERS INTO A HAZARDOUS SITUATION ON THE I-75 FREEWAY. WE SMELLED SMELL OF TIRE AND GAS LEAK. FORTUNATELY, WE WERE ABLE TO PULL OFF THE FREEWAY. IT WAS REPORTED TO TOYOTA AND THEIR DEALERS MULTIPLE TIMES. NO ONE EVEN BOTHERED OR CONCERNED ABOUT THE ISSUE OR SAFETY OF PASSENGERS.
Mfg Campaign: 11133438
Recall Date: Oct 5, 2018
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
AIR BAGS
Potential Consequences:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS. WHILE THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED, THE REAR WHEELS SEIZED. AS A RESULT, THE CONTACT LOST CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND CRASHED INTO A DITCH. THE AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A BODY SHOP AND THE BODY DAMAGES WERE REPAIRED SO THAT THE VEHICLE COULD BE DRIVEN. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO KALISPELL TOYOTA (2845 U.S. 93 S, KALISPELL, MT 59901) FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING, BUT THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE WAS UNDETERMINED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 7,000.
Corrective Action:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS. WHILE THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED, THE REAR WHEELS SEIZED. AS A RESULT, THE CONTACT LOST CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND CRASHED INTO A DITCH. THE AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A BODY SHOP AND THE BODY DAMAGES WERE REPAIRED SO THAT THE VEHICLE COULD BE DRIVEN. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO KALISPELL TOYOTA (2845 U.S. 93 S, KALISPELL, MT 59901) FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING, BUT THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE WAS UNDETERMINED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 7,000.
Additional Notes:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS. WHILE THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED, THE REAR WHEELS SEIZED. AS A RESULT, THE CONTACT LOST CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND CRASHED INTO A DITCH. THE AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A BODY SHOP AND THE BODY DAMAGES WERE REPAIRED SO THAT THE VEHICLE COULD BE DRIVEN. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO KALISPELL TOYOTA (2845 U.S. 93 S, KALISPELL, MT 59901) FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING, BUT THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE WAS UNDETERMINED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 7,000.
Mfg Campaign: 11132444
Recall Date: Oct 1, 2018
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
WHEELS
Potential Consequences:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS. WHILE THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED, THE REAR WHEELS SEIZED. AS A RESULT, THE CONTACT LOST CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND CRASHED INTO A DITCH. THE AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A BODY SHOP AND THE BODY DAMAGES WERE REPAIRED SO THAT THE VEHICLE COULD BE DRIVEN. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO KALISPELL TOYOTA (2845 U.S. 93 S, KALISPELL, MT 59901) FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING, BUT THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE WAS UNDETERMINED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 7,000.
Corrective Action:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS. WHILE THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED, THE REAR WHEELS SEIZED. AS A RESULT, THE CONTACT LOST CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND CRASHED INTO A DITCH. THE AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A BODY SHOP AND THE BODY DAMAGES WERE REPAIRED SO THAT THE VEHICLE COULD BE DRIVEN. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO KALISPELL TOYOTA (2845 U.S. 93 S, KALISPELL, MT 59901) FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING, BUT THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE WAS UNDETERMINED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 7,000.
Additional Notes:
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS. WHILE THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED, THE REAR WHEELS SEIZED. AS A RESULT, THE CONTACT LOST CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND CRASHED INTO A DITCH. THE AIR BAGS FAILED TO DEPLOY. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A BODY SHOP AND THE BODY DAMAGES WERE REPAIRED SO THAT THE VEHICLE COULD BE DRIVEN. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO KALISPELL TOYOTA (2845 U.S. 93 S, KALISPELL, MT 59901) FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING, BUT THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE WAS UNDETERMINED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 7,000.
Mfg Campaign: 11132444
Recall Date: Oct 1, 2018
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
VISIBILITY/WIPER
Potential Consequences:
WE PARKED THE CAR AND WENT FOR A HIKE. UPON RETURNING TO THE CAR, WE NOTICED A FOOT LONG CRACK HAD FORMED IN THE WINDSHIELD. IT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CONNECTED TO ANY CHIPS OR DAMAGE TO THE WINDSHIELD.
Corrective Action:
WE PARKED THE CAR AND WENT FOR A HIKE. UPON RETURNING TO THE CAR, WE NOTICED A FOOT LONG CRACK HAD FORMED IN THE WINDSHIELD. IT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CONNECTED TO ANY CHIPS OR DAMAGE TO THE WINDSHIELD.
Additional Notes:
WE PARKED THE CAR AND WENT FOR A HIKE. UPON RETURNING TO THE CAR, WE NOTICED A FOOT LONG CRACK HAD FORMED IN THE WINDSHIELD. IT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CONNECTED TO ANY CHIPS OR DAMAGE TO THE WINDSHIELD.
Mfg Campaign: 11130795
Recall Date: Sep 22, 2018
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
SERVICE BRAKES
Potential Consequences:
WHIRLING SOUND EMANATING FROM FRONT AREA... GOT PROGRESSIVELY WORSE. FINALLY TOOK TO DEALERSHIP, EVEN THOUGH NO WARNING LIGHTS, AND THEY INDICATED BRAKE ACTUATOR BAD, TO THE TUNE OF $3400. SO I GAVE MY OTHER PRIUS (06) TO MY DAUGHTER TO DRIVE AND SAME NOISE, SO NOW HAVE TWO FAIRLY YOUNG (FOR A TOYOTA) PAPERWEIGHTS, SINCE SERVICE MANAGER SAID UNSAFE TO DRIVE. COMPLAINED TO CORPORATE AND THEY SAID EXTENDED WARRANTY OUT OF TIME. THIS IN UNACCEPTABLE FOR THIS AGE OF CAR.
Corrective Action:
WHIRLING SOUND EMANATING FROM FRONT AREA... GOT PROGRESSIVELY WORSE. FINALLY TOOK TO DEALERSHIP, EVEN THOUGH NO WARNING LIGHTS, AND THEY INDICATED BRAKE ACTUATOR BAD, TO THE TUNE OF $3400. SO I GAVE MY OTHER PRIUS (06) TO MY DAUGHTER TO DRIVE AND SAME NOISE, SO NOW HAVE TWO FAIRLY YOUNG (FOR A TOYOTA) PAPERWEIGHTS, SINCE SERVICE MANAGER SAID UNSAFE TO DRIVE. COMPLAINED TO CORPORATE AND THEY SAID EXTENDED WARRANTY OUT OF TIME. THIS IN UNACCEPTABLE FOR THIS AGE OF CAR.
Additional Notes:
WHIRLING SOUND EMANATING FROM FRONT AREA... GOT PROGRESSIVELY WORSE. FINALLY TOOK TO DEALERSHIP, EVEN THOUGH NO WARNING LIGHTS, AND THEY INDICATED BRAKE ACTUATOR BAD, TO THE TUNE OF $3400. SO I GAVE MY OTHER PRIUS (06) TO MY DAUGHTER TO DRIVE AND SAME NOISE, SO NOW HAVE TWO FAIRLY YOUNG (FOR A TOYOTA) PAPERWEIGHTS, SINCE SERVICE MANAGER SAID UNSAFE TO DRIVE. COMPLAINED TO CORPORATE AND THEY SAID EXTENDED WARRANTY OUT OF TIME. THIS IN UNACCEPTABLE FOR THIS AGE OF CAR.
Mfg Campaign: 11123162
Recall Date: Aug 29, 2018
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
VISIBILITY/WIPER
Potential Consequences:
WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 30 MPH ON A SURFACE STREET, I HEARD A LOUD NOISE AND A CRACK APPEARED AT THE RIGHT EDGE OF THE WINDSHIELD, ADVANCING LEFTWARD UP AND THEN ACROSS THE WINDSHIELD AND INTO MY LINE OF SIGHT IN THE DRIVER'S SEAT. I DID NOT SEE ANYTHING HIT THE WINDSHIELD AND HAVE NEVER HEARD A SOUND LIKE THAT IN NEARLY 50 YEARS OF DRIVING. AFTER RESEARCHING REPLACEMENT WINDSHIELDS, I DISCOVERED THAT THEY ARE BACK ORDERED BECAUSE SO MANY PRIUS OWNERS ARE HAVING TO REPLACE WINDSHIELDS. IN FACT, A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT RELATED TO THESE DEFECTIVE WINDSHIELDS WAS FILED THIS MARCH. (SEE HTTPS://WWW.COURTHOUSENEWS.COM/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/2018/03/TOYOTA.CA_.PDF ) I AM NOW DRIVING WITH WHAT I FEAR IS A SAFETY HAZARD TO ME AND ANY PASSENGERS.
Corrective Action:
WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 30 MPH ON A SURFACE STREET, I HEARD A LOUD NOISE AND A CRACK APPEARED AT THE RIGHT EDGE OF THE WINDSHIELD, ADVANCING LEFTWARD UP AND THEN ACROSS THE WINDSHIELD AND INTO MY LINE OF SIGHT IN THE DRIVER'S SEAT. I DID NOT SEE ANYTHING HIT THE WINDSHIELD AND HAVE NEVER HEARD A SOUND LIKE THAT IN NEARLY 50 YEARS OF DRIVING. AFTER RESEARCHING REPLACEMENT WINDSHIELDS, I DISCOVERED THAT THEY ARE BACK ORDERED BECAUSE SO MANY PRIUS OWNERS ARE HAVING TO REPLACE WINDSHIELDS. IN FACT, A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT RELATED TO THESE DEFECTIVE WINDSHIELDS WAS FILED THIS MARCH. (SEE HTTPS://WWW.COURTHOUSENEWS.COM/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/2018/03/TOYOTA.CA_.PDF ) I AM NOW DRIVING WITH WHAT I FEAR IS A SAFETY HAZARD TO ME AND ANY PASSENGERS.
Additional Notes:
WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 30 MPH ON A SURFACE STREET, I HEARD A LOUD NOISE AND A CRACK APPEARED AT THE RIGHT EDGE OF THE WINDSHIELD, ADVANCING LEFTWARD UP AND THEN ACROSS THE WINDSHIELD AND INTO MY LINE OF SIGHT IN THE DRIVER'S SEAT. I DID NOT SEE ANYTHING HIT THE WINDSHIELD AND HAVE NEVER HEARD A SOUND LIKE THAT IN NEARLY 50 YEARS OF DRIVING. AFTER RESEARCHING REPLACEMENT WINDSHIELDS, I DISCOVERED THAT THEY ARE BACK ORDERED BECAUSE SO MANY PRIUS OWNERS ARE HAVING TO REPLACE WINDSHIELDS. IN FACT, A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT RELATED TO THESE DEFECTIVE WINDSHIELDS WAS FILED THIS MARCH. (SEE HTTPS://WWW.COURTHOUSENEWS.COM/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/2018/03/TOYOTA.CA_.PDF ) I AM NOW DRIVING WITH WHAT I FEAR IS A SAFETY HAZARD TO ME AND ANY PASSENGERS.
Mfg Campaign: 11121905
Recall Date: Aug 23, 2018
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
STRUCTURE:BODY
Potential Consequences:
WINDSHIELD CRACKS FROM IMPACT WITH SMALL ROCKS. IN THE PAST WEEK, MY WINDSHIELD WAS IMPACTED TWICE BY SMALL ROCKS. BOTH TIMES THE WINDSHIELD WAS DAMAGED. BOTH TIMES I WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 50 MILES PER HOUR ON A HIGHWAY. THE WINDHIELD IS THE PROBLEM. I REALIZE A ROCK MIGHT DAMAGE A WINDSHIELD BUT THE GLASS IN MY PRIUS IS MUCH MORE SUSCEPTIBLE TO DAMAGE THAN IS ACCEPTABLE. LUCKILY I GOT BOTH CRACKS REPAIRED BEFORE THE DAMAGE COULD SPREAD AND CAUSE SAFETY ISSUES. (I BOUGHT MY PRIUS THREE MONTHS AGO; IT HAS 5,000 MILES.)
Corrective Action:
WINDSHIELD CRACKS FROM IMPACT WITH SMALL ROCKS. IN THE PAST WEEK, MY WINDSHIELD WAS IMPACTED TWICE BY SMALL ROCKS. BOTH TIMES THE WINDSHIELD WAS DAMAGED. BOTH TIMES I WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 50 MILES PER HOUR ON A HIGHWAY. THE WINDHIELD IS THE PROBLEM. I REALIZE A ROCK MIGHT DAMAGE A WINDSHIELD BUT THE GLASS IN MY PRIUS IS MUCH MORE SUSCEPTIBLE TO DAMAGE THAN IS ACCEPTABLE. LUCKILY I GOT BOTH CRACKS REPAIRED BEFORE THE DAMAGE COULD SPREAD AND CAUSE SAFETY ISSUES. (I BOUGHT MY PRIUS THREE MONTHS AGO; IT HAS 5,000 MILES.)
Additional Notes:
WINDSHIELD CRACKS FROM IMPACT WITH SMALL ROCKS. IN THE PAST WEEK, MY WINDSHIELD WAS IMPACTED TWICE BY SMALL ROCKS. BOTH TIMES THE WINDSHIELD WAS DAMAGED. BOTH TIMES I WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 50 MILES PER HOUR ON A HIGHWAY. THE WINDHIELD IS THE PROBLEM. I REALIZE A ROCK MIGHT DAMAGE A WINDSHIELD BUT THE GLASS IN MY PRIUS IS MUCH MORE SUSCEPTIBLE TO DAMAGE THAN IS ACCEPTABLE. LUCKILY I GOT BOTH CRACKS REPAIRED BEFORE THE DAMAGE COULD SPREAD AND CAUSE SAFETY ISSUES. (I BOUGHT MY PRIUS THREE MONTHS AGO; IT HAS 5,000 MILES.)
Mfg Campaign: 11121583
Recall Date: Aug 22, 2018
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
VISIBILITY/WIPER
Potential Consequences:
IN EARLY OR MID MAY 2018, WHEN MY NEW 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS PRIME HAD LESS THAN OR APPROX. 10,000 MILES ON IT AND WHEN I WAS GETTING INTO MY CAR ONE SUNNY MORNING IN MY GATED PARKING LOT, I FIRST NOTICED A VERY THIN VERTICAL CRACK (CIRCA 2-3 INCHES) ON MY WINDSHIELD - STARTING AT THE VERY BOTTOM OF THE WINDSHIELD BELOW MY WIPERS. THE CRACK WAS LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE GLASS, I.E. BETWEEN DRIVER & PASSENGER. THE CAR WAS STATIONARY, AND HAD SAT IN MY PARKING SPOT FOR THE LAST DAY OR TWO, AND THEN ON THIS MAY MORNING, THERE WAS A CRACK. NO CHIP MARK HAD EXISTED PRIOR TO THIS, AND NO ROCK HAD HIT IT WHEN I DROVE IT LAST. THERE WAS NO LARGE TREE NEAR MY PARKING SPOT, PLUS NOTHING WAS ON THE WINDSHIELD WHEN I GOT TO MY CAR THAT MORNING, SO NOTHING FELL ON IT. IN LESS THAN A WEEK, THE DAMAGE ON THE GLASS GREW LARGER (6 INCHES) AND WAS SPREADING. I TOOK MY CAR IN FOR 10,000 MILE SERVICE PER TOYOTACARE, BUT TOYOTA DENIED WARRANTY COVERAGE FOR THE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF ITS FRAGILE PRIUS PRIME'S WINDSHIELD, DESPITE IT BEING WITHIN THE WARRANTY PERIOD AND THE DEFECT MANIFESTING ITSELF WHEN THE CAR WAS STATIONARY. WITHIN THE NEXT FEW DAYS, THE CRACK GREW AND SPREAD LARGER, EVENTUALLY TURNING 90 DEGREES AND EXPANDING HORIZONTALLY. IN LATE MAY OR EARLY JUNE 2018, I REPLACED THE WINDSHIELD VIA SAFELITE AUTO. THE TOTAL BALANCE OF THE FIRST REPLACEMENT WAS ABOUT $800 - I.E. THE REPLACEMENT COST WAS ABOUT $400, BUT I WAS TOLD MORE MONEY WAS NEEDED TO PROPERLY FIX CAMERA (ADAS) PROBLEMS CAUSED BY REPLACING THE WINDSHIELD. IN JUNE 2018, THE NEW WINDSHIELD CRACKED, ALMOST 1 OR 2 WEEKS AFTER I JUST HAD IT REPLACED. WHILE DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY, I NOTICED A TINY OBJECT HIT MY WINDSHIELD. I CONTACTED THE DEALER. IN AUGUST 2018, THE DEALERSHIP SAID IT KNEW OF NO PROBLEMS WITH THE 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS WINDSHIELDS.
Corrective Action:
IN EARLY OR MID MAY 2018, WHEN MY NEW 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS PRIME HAD LESS THAN OR APPROX. 10,000 MILES ON IT AND WHEN I WAS GETTING INTO MY CAR ONE SUNNY MORNING IN MY GATED PARKING LOT, I FIRST NOTICED A VERY THIN VERTICAL CRACK (CIRCA 2-3 INCHES) ON MY WINDSHIELD - STARTING AT THE VERY BOTTOM OF THE WINDSHIELD BELOW MY WIPERS. THE CRACK WAS LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE GLASS, I.E. BETWEEN DRIVER & PASSENGER. THE CAR WAS STATIONARY, AND HAD SAT IN MY PARKING SPOT FOR THE LAST DAY OR TWO, AND THEN ON THIS MAY MORNING, THERE WAS A CRACK. NO CHIP MARK HAD EXISTED PRIOR TO THIS, AND NO ROCK HAD HIT IT WHEN I DROVE IT LAST. THERE WAS NO LARGE TREE NEAR MY PARKING SPOT, PLUS NOTHING WAS ON THE WINDSHIELD WHEN I GOT TO MY CAR THAT MORNING, SO NOTHING FELL ON IT. IN LESS THAN A WEEK, THE DAMAGE ON THE GLASS GREW LARGER (6 INCHES) AND WAS SPREADING. I TOOK MY CAR IN FOR 10,000 MILE SERVICE PER TOYOTACARE, BUT TOYOTA DENIED WARRANTY COVERAGE FOR THE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF ITS FRAGILE PRIUS PRIME'S WINDSHIELD, DESPITE IT BEING WITHIN THE WARRANTY PERIOD AND THE DEFECT MANIFESTING ITSELF WHEN THE CAR WAS STATIONARY. WITHIN THE NEXT FEW DAYS, THE CRACK GREW AND SPREAD LARGER, EVENTUALLY TURNING 90 DEGREES AND EXPANDING HORIZONTALLY. IN LATE MAY OR EARLY JUNE 2018, I REPLACED THE WINDSHIELD VIA SAFELITE AUTO. THE TOTAL BALANCE OF THE FIRST REPLACEMENT WAS ABOUT $800 - I.E. THE REPLACEMENT COST WAS ABOUT $400, BUT I WAS TOLD MORE MONEY WAS NEEDED TO PROPERLY FIX CAMERA (ADAS) PROBLEMS CAUSED BY REPLACING THE WINDSHIELD. IN JUNE 2018, THE NEW WINDSHIELD CRACKED, ALMOST 1 OR 2 WEEKS AFTER I JUST HAD IT REPLACED. WHILE DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY, I NOTICED A TINY OBJECT HIT MY WINDSHIELD. I CONTACTED THE DEALER. IN AUGUST 2018, THE DEALERSHIP SAID IT KNEW OF NO PROBLEMS WITH THE 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS WINDSHIELDS.
Additional Notes:
IN EARLY OR MID MAY 2018, WHEN MY NEW 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS PRIME HAD LESS THAN OR APPROX. 10,000 MILES ON IT AND WHEN I WAS GETTING INTO MY CAR ONE SUNNY MORNING IN MY GATED PARKING LOT, I FIRST NOTICED A VERY THIN VERTICAL CRACK (CIRCA 2-3 INCHES) ON MY WINDSHIELD - STARTING AT THE VERY BOTTOM OF THE WINDSHIELD BELOW MY WIPERS. THE CRACK WAS LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE GLASS, I.E. BETWEEN DRIVER & PASSENGER. THE CAR WAS STATIONARY, AND HAD SAT IN MY PARKING SPOT FOR THE LAST DAY OR TWO, AND THEN ON THIS MAY MORNING, THERE WAS A CRACK. NO CHIP MARK HAD EXISTED PRIOR TO THIS, AND NO ROCK HAD HIT IT WHEN I DROVE IT LAST. THERE WAS NO LARGE TREE NEAR MY PARKING SPOT, PLUS NOTHING WAS ON THE WINDSHIELD WHEN I GOT TO MY CAR THAT MORNING, SO NOTHING FELL ON IT. IN LESS THAN A WEEK, THE DAMAGE ON THE GLASS GREW LARGER (6 INCHES) AND WAS SPREADING. I TOOK MY CAR IN FOR 10,000 MILE SERVICE PER TOYOTACARE, BUT TOYOTA DENIED WARRANTY COVERAGE FOR THE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF ITS FRAGILE PRIUS PRIME'S WINDSHIELD, DESPITE IT BEING WITHIN THE WARRANTY PERIOD AND THE DEFECT MANIFESTING ITSELF WHEN THE CAR WAS STATIONARY. WITHIN THE NEXT FEW DAYS, THE CRACK GREW AND SPREAD LARGER, EVENTUALLY TURNING 90 DEGREES AND EXPANDING HORIZONTALLY. IN LATE MAY OR EARLY JUNE 2018, I REPLACED THE WINDSHIELD VIA SAFELITE AUTO. THE TOTAL BALANCE OF THE FIRST REPLACEMENT WAS ABOUT $800 - I.E. THE REPLACEMENT COST WAS ABOUT $400, BUT I WAS TOLD MORE MONEY WAS NEEDED TO PROPERLY FIX CAMERA (ADAS) PROBLEMS CAUSED BY REPLACING THE WINDSHIELD. IN JUNE 2018, THE NEW WINDSHIELD CRACKED, ALMOST 1 OR 2 WEEKS AFTER I JUST HAD IT REPLACED. WHILE DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY, I NOTICED A TINY OBJECT HIT MY WINDSHIELD. I CONTACTED THE DEALER. IN AUGUST 2018, THE DEALERSHIP SAID IT KNEW OF NO PROBLEMS WITH THE 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS WINDSHIELDS.
Mfg Campaign: 11121789
Recall Date: Aug 22, 2018
Toyota Motor Corporation
Defect Description:
VISIBILITY/WIPER
Potential Consequences:
IN EARLY OR MID MAY 2018, WHEN MY NEW 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS PRIME HAD LESS THAN OR APPROX. 10,000 MILES ON IT AND WHEN I WAS GETTING INTO MY CAR ONE SUNNY MORNING IN MY GATED PARKING LOT, I FIRST NOTICED A VERY THIN VERTICAL CRACK (CIRCA 2-3 INCHES) ON MY WINDSHIELD - STARTING AT THE VERY BOTTOM OF THE WINDSHIELD BELOW MY WIPERS. THE CRACK WAS LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE GLASS, I.E. BETWEEN DRIVER & PASSENGER. THE CAR WAS STATIONARY, AND HAD SAT IN MY PARKING SPOT FOR THE LAST DAY OR TWO, AND THEN ON THIS MAY MORNING, THERE WAS A CRACK. NO CHIP MARK HAD EXISTED PRIOR TO THIS, AND NO ROCK HAD HIT IT WHEN I DROVE IT LAST. THERE WAS NO LARGE TREE NEAR MY PARKING SPOT, PLUS NOTHING WAS ON THE WINDSHIELD WHEN I GOT TO MY CAR THAT MORNING, SO NOTHING FELL ON IT. IN LESS THAN A WEEK, THE DAMAGE ON THE GLASS GREW LARGER (6 INCHES) AND WAS SPREADING. I TOOK MY CAR IN FOR 10,000 MILE SERVICE PER TOYOTACARE, BUT TOYOTA DENIED WARRANTY COVERAGE FOR THE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF ITS FRAGILE PRIUS PRIME'S WINDSHIELD, DESPITE IT BEING WITHIN THE WARRANTY PERIOD AND THE DEFECT MANIFESTING ITSELF WHEN THE CAR WAS STATIONARY. WITHIN THE NEXT FEW DAYS, THE CRACK GREW AND SPREAD LARGER, EVENTUALLY TURNING 90 DEGREES AND EXPANDING HORIZONTALLY. IN LATE MAY OR EARLY JUNE 2018, I REPLACED THE WINDSHIELD VIA SAFELITE AUTO. THE TOTAL BALANCE OF THE FIRST REPLACEMENT WAS ABOUT $800 - I.E. THE REPLACEMENT COST WAS ABOUT $400, BUT I WAS TOLD MORE MONEY WAS NEEDED TO PROPERLY FIX CAMERA (ADAS) PROBLEMS CAUSED BY REPLACING THE WINDSHIELD. IN JUNE 2018, THE NEW WINDSHIELD CRACKED, ALMOST 1 OR 2 WEEKS AFTER I JUST HAD IT REPLACED. WHILE DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY, I NOTICED A TINY OBJECT HIT MY WINDSHIELD. I CONTACTED THE DEALER. IN AUGUST 2018, THE DEALERSHIP SAID IT KNEW OF NO PROBLEMS WITH THE 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS WINDSHIELDS.
Corrective Action:
IN EARLY OR MID MAY 2018, WHEN MY NEW 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS PRIME HAD LESS THAN OR APPROX. 10,000 MILES ON IT AND WHEN I WAS GETTING INTO MY CAR ONE SUNNY MORNING IN MY GATED PARKING LOT, I FIRST NOTICED A VERY THIN VERTICAL CRACK (CIRCA 2-3 INCHES) ON MY WINDSHIELD - STARTING AT THE VERY BOTTOM OF THE WINDSHIELD BELOW MY WIPERS. THE CRACK WAS LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE GLASS, I.E. BETWEEN DRIVER & PASSENGER. THE CAR WAS STATIONARY, AND HAD SAT IN MY PARKING SPOT FOR THE LAST DAY OR TWO, AND THEN ON THIS MAY MORNING, THERE WAS A CRACK. NO CHIP MARK HAD EXISTED PRIOR TO THIS, AND NO ROCK HAD HIT IT WHEN I DROVE IT LAST. THERE WAS NO LARGE TREE NEAR MY PARKING SPOT, PLUS NOTHING WAS ON THE WINDSHIELD WHEN I GOT TO MY CAR THAT MORNING, SO NOTHING FELL ON IT. IN LESS THAN A WEEK, THE DAMAGE ON THE GLASS GREW LARGER (6 INCHES) AND WAS SPREADING. I TOOK MY CAR IN FOR 10,000 MILE SERVICE PER TOYOTACARE, BUT TOYOTA DENIED WARRANTY COVERAGE FOR THE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF ITS FRAGILE PRIUS PRIME'S WINDSHIELD, DESPITE IT BEING WITHIN THE WARRANTY PERIOD AND THE DEFECT MANIFESTING ITSELF WHEN THE CAR WAS STATIONARY. WITHIN THE NEXT FEW DAYS, THE CRACK GREW AND SPREAD LARGER, EVENTUALLY TURNING 90 DEGREES AND EXPANDING HORIZONTALLY. IN LATE MAY OR EARLY JUNE 2018, I REPLACED THE WINDSHIELD VIA SAFELITE AUTO. THE TOTAL BALANCE OF THE FIRST REPLACEMENT WAS ABOUT $800 - I.E. THE REPLACEMENT COST WAS ABOUT $400, BUT I WAS TOLD MORE MONEY WAS NEEDED TO PROPERLY FIX CAMERA (ADAS) PROBLEMS CAUSED BY REPLACING THE WINDSHIELD. IN JUNE 2018, THE NEW WINDSHIELD CRACKED, ALMOST 1 OR 2 WEEKS AFTER I JUST HAD IT REPLACED. WHILE DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY, I NOTICED A TINY OBJECT HIT MY WINDSHIELD. I CONTACTED THE DEALER. IN AUGUST 2018, THE DEALERSHIP SAID IT KNEW OF NO PROBLEMS WITH THE 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS WINDSHIELDS.
Additional Notes:
IN EARLY OR MID MAY 2018, WHEN MY NEW 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS PRIME HAD LESS THAN OR APPROX. 10,000 MILES ON IT AND WHEN I WAS GETTING INTO MY CAR ONE SUNNY MORNING IN MY GATED PARKING LOT, I FIRST NOTICED A VERY THIN VERTICAL CRACK (CIRCA 2-3 INCHES) ON MY WINDSHIELD - STARTING AT THE VERY BOTTOM OF THE WINDSHIELD BELOW MY WIPERS. THE CRACK WAS LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE GLASS, I.E. BETWEEN DRIVER & PASSENGER. THE CAR WAS STATIONARY, AND HAD SAT IN MY PARKING SPOT FOR THE LAST DAY OR TWO, AND THEN ON THIS MAY MORNING, THERE WAS A CRACK. NO CHIP MARK HAD EXISTED PRIOR TO THIS, AND NO ROCK HAD HIT IT WHEN I DROVE IT LAST. THERE WAS NO LARGE TREE NEAR MY PARKING SPOT, PLUS NOTHING WAS ON THE WINDSHIELD WHEN I GOT TO MY CAR THAT MORNING, SO NOTHING FELL ON IT. IN LESS THAN A WEEK, THE DAMAGE ON THE GLASS GREW LARGER (6 INCHES) AND WAS SPREADING. I TOOK MY CAR IN FOR 10,000 MILE SERVICE PER TOYOTACARE, BUT TOYOTA DENIED WARRANTY COVERAGE FOR THE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF ITS FRAGILE PRIUS PRIME'S WINDSHIELD, DESPITE IT BEING WITHIN THE WARRANTY PERIOD AND THE DEFECT MANIFESTING ITSELF WHEN THE CAR WAS STATIONARY. WITHIN THE NEXT FEW DAYS, THE CRACK GREW AND SPREAD LARGER, EVENTUALLY TURNING 90 DEGREES AND EXPANDING HORIZONTALLY. IN LATE MAY OR EARLY JUNE 2018, I REPLACED THE WINDSHIELD VIA SAFELITE AUTO. THE TOTAL BALANCE OF THE FIRST REPLACEMENT WAS ABOUT $800 - I.E. THE REPLACEMENT COST WAS ABOUT $400, BUT I WAS TOLD MORE MONEY WAS NEEDED TO PROPERLY FIX CAMERA (ADAS) PROBLEMS CAUSED BY REPLACING THE WINDSHIELD. IN JUNE 2018, THE NEW WINDSHIELD CRACKED, ALMOST 1 OR 2 WEEKS AFTER I JUST HAD IT REPLACED. WHILE DRIVING ON THE HIGHWAY, I NOTICED A TINY OBJECT HIT MY WINDSHIELD. I CONTACTED THE DEALER. IN AUGUST 2018, THE DEALERSHIP SAID IT KNEW OF NO PROBLEMS WITH THE 2017 TOYOTA PRIUS WINDSHIELDS.
Mfg Campaign: 11121790
Recall Date: Aug 22, 2018
Need Legal Help?
Featured Attorneys
Barry Edzant
Edzant Price LLC
Valencia, CA • 36 yrs
Focus: Lemon Law, Personal Injury